Shell usage
I've been reading archives of Wandering Thoughts, the blog of a UToronto sysadmin. Lots of interesting ideas. Reading PersistentVsDisposableUsage, in which he claims that most people either open a new shell for each task or use the same set of long running shells for multiple tasks, I realized I fall pretty squarely into the second category. I keep shells open that fill the desktop space, and use whichever one is free. But where I should be, really, is "shell per task", where when doing one class of thing I use a specific shell instance. This would keep history straight.
I also started thinking about what Sameer does with history: all commands typed go both into a full history file somewhere and a .local_history file in the current directory. The local_history idea I don't like, as it clutters things up a lot, but a full history that's more robust than the shell history would be nice. So I added the lines below to my prompt function in bash:
echo "$(date +%Y-%m-%d--%H-%M-%S) $(hostname) $PWD $(history | tail -n 1)" >> ~/.full_history
I think this should work, but it's possible that with appending from multiple places at once it will get clobbered at some point.
I also thought about what commands do I run:
$ cat combined-history | awk '{print $2}' | susrn | head
619 ls
516 find
413 cat
304 python
275 cd
216 svn
215 rm
199 more
130 for
122 svc
Alternately, taking into account all the compound commands I run by looking at the commands following pipe and semicolon in addition to line starters:
$ cat combined-history | sed s/'[;|]'/'\nNNN '/g | awk '{print $2}'| susrn | head -n 12
881 grep
620 ls
544 do
536 done
535 sed
524 find
501 python
465 cat
412 while
315 head
283 cd
291 more
(combined-history is the result of running history in each shell)
Notes:
I invoke most python scripts with python instead of a shebang. I use a lot of python.
I leave emacs running most of the time in its own windows. So it doesn't show up.
The command svc is svn commit
The do and done entries are higher than while because I sometimes use for. The do entry is higher than the done one because I leave off final done more than I'd like. I extended the second one to 12, in case you don't want to look at do and done.
While I realize there are performance reasons not to, I use cat $fname | cmds all the time. It's much more consistent because then everything follows the same pattern. Bash could consider optimizing "cat single-arg | cmds" to "< single-arg cmds".
Comment via: facebook